28.8 C
New York
Friday, August 15, 2025

It is Time To Cease Doing Characteristic Requests


Virtually each start-up and fairly a number of bigger corporations have methods for customers to recommend options. These make sense at first look: They offer you a scalable option to perceive what your prospects need. Absolutely, you’ll need to use this data to tell your prioritization!

I intend to point out not solely that these aren’t useful however that they’re damageable. However worry not! As a result of I may even clarify do it higher. So, whether or not you like your present characteristic request kind or take into account constructing one, please learn on!

Let’s begin with the harm facet, which is extra counterintuitive. Positive, you would possibly assume, we might not get nice concepts in our public characteristic requests, however having them gained’t damage us!

That’s not fairly so.

See, there are 4 huge classes of options coming from customers:

  1. The wildly impractical: stuff that simply doesn’t make a whole lot of sense¹
  2. The strategically unaligned: concepts that don’t additional your imaginative and prescient — although they could match one in every of your rivals
  3. The massive / not for now: concepts which are sound and aligned however will take a very long time to construct or can’t be performed proper now for no matter different motive
  4. The straightforward / already deliberate: options which are aligned and are both simple to construct or already in progress

See, solely customers submitting class 4 concepts will possible obtain a well timed decision. But in addition, since these are issues you’re both already engaged on or are very simple tweaks to the present model of your product… Why was consumer enter needed?

The opposite three classes will look ahead to a decision that can by no means come² and develop annoyed. If the difficulty tracker is public, their frustration will probably be broadcast to your entire world, as within the case of this situation in Atlassian’s flagship Jira product, which was filed in 2006 and nonetheless hasn’t been resolved. Customers aren’t glad about it.

A small pattern of the dialog underneath a nearly-two-decade-old Jira situation

And simply to be clear, I don’t blame Atlassian for not fixing this³: there are lots of the explanation why it might not have been prioritized. However no matter they might be, the customers requesting it are left feeling deserted: even when that characteristic doesn’t make sense to Atlassian, it does for them.

Even Featurebase, regardless of offering a characteristic request resolution, has a complete article reassuring its customers about the necessity to say no to most characteristic requests. They are saying:

As a startup, it’s important to remain true to your core targets and model id. This would possibly imply turning down options that don’t align together with your strategic targets, irrespective of how widespread they’re.

Proper on! That’s options from class two proper there.

I don’t know that anybody has exact stats on the breakdown of characteristic ideas amongst these classes, however I’d be shocked if greater than 5% had been in class 4 as a result of there are simply so many concepts on the market! So, most of your customers will probably be left like these poor Atlassian prospects, uncared for and with out recourse. This isn’t a sense you need to encourage amongst your customers, is it?

You would possibly assume that the few customers whose points you possibly can handle will offset this sense, however this isn’t the case. So, we come to the opposite drawback with characteristic trackers.

When your customers request options, their ideas will probably be very iterative. They may begin with the product as it’s and recommend a twist, including a button right here, some characteristic there, or rearranging the knowledge on some web page. Their ideas will typically be based mostly on their expertise with a direct competitor: Are you able to make your product really feel extra like that one?

However this shouldn’t be information to you. As an expert, you need to have a deep understanding of the present standing of your product and any adjustments which are instantly adjoining to it, and also you also needs to have an in-depth information of the merchandise of your (actual) rivals. Your response to most characteristic requests aligned together with your imaginative and prescient ought to be: “I do know.”

The one factor which you could’t depend in your customers to offer you is disruptive innovation. That’s the level of Ford’s well-known quote:

If I had requested folks what they wished, they’d have mentioned quicker horses.

“Individuals” in Ford’s time couldn’t have requested for vehicles as a result of vehicles weren’t a factor. The customers noticed the proximate drawback—my horse isn’t very quick—however couldn’t bounce to the final word drawback, which isn’t making a speedier horse however going from level A to level B shortly and conveniently. Horses needn’t be concerned.

This is likely one of the main limitations of information and consumer suggestions for innovation. As I’ve commented earlier than, customers, by and enormous, solely know what got here earlier than. They’ll’t let you know what ought to come subsequent.

Thankfully, there’s a resolution to this that doesn’t contain a number of information and doesn’t require you to arrange a characteristic request consumption kind… truly, it doesn’t require rather more than you: consumer analysis.

Consumer analysis means empathizing together with your customers, and this implies speaking to them. Particularly, it means having open conversations: Don’t ask your customers about your product, however ask about themselves. Who’re they? What do they do for work? What are their points? Why did they select your product within the first place? How else have they tried resolving their issues?

One factor to bear in mind is that essentially the most invaluable concepts will initially look horrible. Give it some thought: something that clearly appears to be like like a good suggestion ought to already be on prime of your thoughts — and will probably be on prime of your rivals’ minds, too! However sometimes, a product comes alongside that flies within the face of typical knowledge. One that’s inferior to its competitors, as per prevalent efficiency indicators. The iPhone was one such product: inferior to the gadgets of the time by its worth, fragility, battery life, lack of a bodily keyboard, and plenty of extra elements. However, in fact, the iPhone wasn’t seen as inferior as a result of it completely redefined its class.

What does that should do with consumer analysis? Effectively, no consumer would have requested for an iPhone. No consumer would have crammed a Nokia characteristic request asking for his or her gadget to be extra fragile or costly. It requires deep empathy together with your customers to appreciate that these standards aren’t what issues: that the consumer base is prepared for a wholly new paradigm.

The one greatest counterargument to consumer analysis is scalability. Even when your consumer depend is within the tons of, you gained’t have the ability to discuss to a major fraction of them, so why even trouble? That’s half misunderstanding of consumer analysis and half cope, as I really feel that many individuals would do something if it means not having to speak to different human beings.

Scalability just isn’t an actual situation since you don’t want to speak to all your customers or perhaps a statistically important fraction of them. Over thirty years in the past, Jakob Nielsen had already decided that, when attempting to determine usability issues with an interface, testing with greater than 5 to 10 customers was pointless attributable to diminishing returns⁴.

Nielsen et al.’s seminal paper, “A Mathematical Mannequin of the Discovering of Usability Issues,” confirmed that between 5 and ten testers yielded the perfect worth when figuring out usability points with an interface. Extra testers incurred further prices for a marginal additional benefit.

An analogous factor occurs with consumer analysis. The tales you hear out of your customers will begin repeating one another. You’ll shortly begin seeing patterns within the solutions you’ll be getting. You’ll be taught why your customers “rent” your product.

It is going to be your job (not the consumer’s!) to know your customers’ actual issues and resolve them. That is the worth you deliver to the desk as an entrepreneur, CEO, or product supervisor.

Upon getting recognized a difficulty and devised an answer, there will probably be loads of scalable methods to check it. However within the meantime, do your self a favor and kill that suggestions kind.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles