At The Cash: Paul Vigna explains “What’s Cash?” (August 6, 2025)
It’s a driving think about our lives. However how usually have you considered these little inexperienced items of paper in your pockets? Is cash actual, or just a collective delusion?
Full transcript beneath.
~~~
About this week’s visitor:
Paul Vigna is a reporter for The Wall Avenue Journal and has been a journalist for greater than 25 years, as a reporter, editor, and photographer. He at present covers the cryptocurrency sector, together with bitcoin, different digital currencies, and blockchain-related applied sciences. He’s the creator of “The Almightier: How Cash Grew to become God, Greed Grew to become Advantage, and Debt Grew to become Sin.”
For more information, see:
~~~
Discover all the earlier On the Cash episodes right here, and within the MiB feed on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Spotify, and Bloomberg. And discover the complete musical playlist of all of the songs I’ve used on On the Cash on Spotify
TRANSCRIPT:
Cash. It’s a driving think about our lives. However how usually have you considered these little inexperienced items of paper in your pockets and the concept created it, or the digital zeros and ones in our banks and brokerage accounts that symbolize your cash? Is it actual or is cash merely a collective delusion?
I’m Barry Ritholtz and on as we speak’s version of On the Cash, we’re gonna chat concerning the idea of what precisely cash is to assist us unpack all of this and what it means to you. Let’s herald Paul Vigna of the Wall Avenue Journal. He’s revealed quite a few books on cash crypto, his newest guide, “The Almightier, how Cash Grew to become God, greed Grew to become Advantage and Debt Grew to become Sin.”
Barry Ritholtz: Paul, let’s begin with the fundamentals. You outline cash as a perception system. Clarify what meaning.
Paul Vigna: Positive, briefly. So, I imply, that is, look, that is one thing that, that I by no means thought of for almost all of my life. To me, cash was simply what was in my pockets, what was in my checking account. I may use it, I may purchase issues. I didn’t fear about what it was, it, it wasn’t essential to me. That modified over the past 10 years or so. And I began pondering to my, you already know, I began excited about this query, what’s cash?
And that despatched me down this rabbit gap. And the place I’ve, the place I’ve come out on that’s that cash is just not an actual factor. You, you, you maintain cash in your hand, you maintain paper {dollars}, you maintain cash, and also you suppose it’s actual. You suppose that’s cash. That isn’t cash. That’s a factor that represents cash, greenback payments, cash, cash itself is, it’s an, it’s a system.
It’s a system we made up. It’s a system. Human beings invented as a means to assist us preserve observe of sources of all our stuff. You have a look at the purpose of a society and actually the purpose of a big scale society is to get a bunch of individuals collectively to mix their efforts and their sources to care for one another. The way in which as societies obtained a lot bigger and bigger, they discovered an environment friendly means to do this. And it was mainly to have every thing represented by cash. After which when you have cash, you might have a declare on the group’s sources. And what has occurred over the past 5,000 years or so is that, that we’ve mythologized cash into this actual factor. And we’ve satisfied ourselves, we’ve hypnotized ourselves into believing that it’s a actual factor to the purpose the place the pursuit of it by itself has taken over most of what we consider as the purpose of economics in society. But it surely’s not an actual factor. It’s not a factor that exists by itself. It’s a factor that we created as a system that we created. And it has change into for us a perception system.
Barry Ritholtz: So I wanna stick with that. ’trigger it’s fascinating within the guide you write, cash isn’t actual, it has no goal existence of its personal. Clarify how cash is basically simply this agreed upon collective system that everyone accepts, though it’s an summary idea that’s created by folks. Proper.
Paul Vigna: And look, the entire level of the guide is that, not the entire level, however a predominant level of the guide is that cash is a product of faith. So I’ll, I’ll clarify it by way of that.
Barry Ritholtz: Say that once more. Cash is a product of faith.
Paul Vigna: Cash is a product of faith. And I’ll ex i’ll, I’ll clarify it by way of that. ’trigger that’s how this all turns into very germane. When cash first seems within the historic file, it’s in these historic Mesopotamian temples. Temple officers developed cash. They developed cash and writing truly as a technique to preserve observe of the temple’s possessions. And that’s the place it begins. And what emerged from that, the belief of that truly was that this was an extremely environment friendly system. Cash is definitely a, a very good product. For those who consider phrases of issues we’ve invented over our historical past. We didn’t invent fireplace, however you know the way to make use of fireplace, the wheel, bridges, boats, something. I may sit right here all day and do it proper. Cash is a kind of issues we invented.
Cash was an extremely environment friendly technique to preserve observe of sources.
And what I discover fascinating is that as quickly as cash emerges, that’s while you begin to see what we actually consider as, as fashionable quote unquote human beings. Society takes off. It thrives as a result of cash is a priceless product. It’s a helpful product. The issue has change into that cash is such a great product that we’ve began to think about it on it as this factor by itself with its personal values and its personal existence. And plenty of that’s tied up in our beliefs in faith. ’trigger as I mentioned, extra of its historical past, was it instantly a product of faith than it was an unbiased factor that existed by itself. So our beliefs in faith, in gods, and in, in supernatural beings that management what we do and the way we reside is tied up very, very intently with how we really feel about cash.
Barry Ritholtz: Let me stick with the idea of Mesopotamia. You write a few metropolis there’s 50,000 plus folks residing inside the confines of this walled metropolis with tens of hundreds extra working within the discipline, working within the farms and suburbs. However what’s fascinating concerning the description of the ity is the one largest constructing within the metropolis and maybe on this planet is the temple, which could be seen for miles and miles round, even from outdoors of the partitions of town.
The primary writing is protecting observe of right here’s how a lot barley has come into the temple; Right here’s how a lot folks ha owe on this. Right here’s how we create a system of property and liabilities of credit score and debt.
All of it stems from the truth that the complete metropolis was pushed by faith. Plus folks needed to work to outlive. And the powers that be needed to give you a technique of protecting observe of all this.
Is that the genesis of the shut relationship between cash and faith or is it one thing else?
Paul Vigna: It’s that precisely. And, and what I attempted to do in speaking about Europe was evaluate it to a contemporary metropolis, NY city. That’s what Europe was like again 5,000 years in the past is that this nice me, cosmopolitan, metropolitan metropolis. And also you’re proper, the temple was the biggest, the the, this entire metropolis actually revolved across the temple.
What’s essential after we speak about fashionable and historic cities is, is to understand there have been plenty of issues that had been related, however there was one factor that was massively totally different. And it’s that town revolved across the temple in these historic societies. And I discovered this very fascinating myself in these historic societies, the complete level of life truly was geared round one purpose. And that purpose was to please the gods. Folks in these cities believed that the gods, a number of gods had been actual.
They existed and so they managed every thing. And whether or not you lived or died or how effectively you lived after which died and the place you went after you died, all of that was decided by these gods. And also you needed to please the gods. There was no separation of church and state. The church was the state and the state’s total existence was constructed round attempting to please these gods.
And that framework is what cash emerges from. And, and, and that framework I believe is in extremely essential to our understanding of how we really feel about cash as we speak. Wealth was seen as an indication of the God’s favor. If the God appreciated town, if the God appreciated the ruler, if the God appreciated the folks, they flourished. That they had wealth, cash was a illustration of that. So cash was a illustration of the God’s favor and also you needed extra of it, after all. I actually suppose that colours so much about what we take into consideration cash as we speak and the way we really feel about it. But it surely’s one thing that has simply been sort of buried in our collective unconscious and we don’t, we simply don’t see it.
Barry Ritholtz: Let’s speak about confidence and religion, which you emphasize all through the guide. What function did belief play in establishments, be they authorities or banks and even varied religions in shaping the general public’s perception about cash over time?
Paul Vigna: Belief is a large a part of how we worth cash. I’ll offer you a great instance of this: 1933, the Nice Despair the USA is in simply the worst financial form it’s ever been in. The system has largely failed; the banking system has collapsed; the federal government is, is barely working. And the federal government again then was not practically as giant as it’s now. It didn’t have as a lot of a direct impression in folks’s lives. In giant elements of the nation, the federal government simply wasn’t there. And I believe there have been actual fears that the complete American experiment was going to break down over what had occurred in 1929 and the years after.
So FDR is available in, he will get elected, he begins doing — it’s, it’s a fairly fascinating factor on the time — he makes use of a contemporary expertise known as radio. He does these fireplace chats, he simply talks into the radio and he explains issues to folks
They had been tremendously profitable. They actually labored. What’s the primary fireplace chat about cash and banking? FDR the president will get on the radio and simply explains to folks how the banking system works, how cash works, what they plan to do, the way it’s gonna work.
And what he says to them is, he says, it’s important to have religion, it’s important to have perception within the banks, within the cash and all this stuff. And collectively, if all of us have religion, we are going to succeed. It’s wonderful to suppose that religion and and belief had been the issues he was actually speaking about. However in the event you, in the event you flip it round and look each single time you might have considered one of these incidents the place a foreign money fails and a authorities fails and you’ve got hyperinflation and every thing falls aside, the widespread denominator in all these examples, folks lose religion within the cash.
Which if you consider what I used to be simply saying is sort of bizarre. Why ought to religion in cash matter in any respect if cash was actual? If cash had its personal existence, if the intrinsic worth of a greenback invoice was one thing that was tangible, as an illustration, a tree has intrinsic worth, copper oil, commodity, all this stuff have intrinsic values, intrinsic makes use of – they’re actual. Your religion in them doesn’t matter one bit. Whether or not or not you consider in copper, copper continues to be there and every thing you need to use it for continues to be there.
Cash is totally different. For those who don’t think about cash. Take a look at Zimbabwe, YMR, Germany, Argentina, all these examples. For those who don’t think about cash, cash is ineffective. Why? Why ought to religion matter?
And the reason being as a result of cash isn’t actual and cash is simply the system we agreed upon. So long as folks agree to make use of the system, the system works. As quickly as folks cease believing within the worth of the system, they mistrust it, it collapses. That’s the core, core a part of every thing I’m speaking about.
Barry Ritholtz: So that you talked about within the guide that one of many first fireplace chats that FDR did over the radio was to debate the quote, lack of confidence within the soundness of banks and his plan to revive religion, to revive confidence, together with issues just like the creation of the Securities and Trade Fee so we don’t have issues on Wall Avenue and the Federal Deposit Insurance coverage company, so we don’t have these varied runs on banks and on and on the checklist goes.
All of this sounds prefer it was simply an try to shore up the idea system, the religion within the banking system. Is that what you’re saying?
Paul Vigna: Completely. That’s what it was. I’m not, I’m not accusing FDR of being underhanded, however under no circumstances he was being somewhat underhanded. He was attempting to hypnotize folks into believing in cash once more in US {dollars} and utilizing them. And he needed to go on the radio and he needed to speak to them and he was an extremely persuasive speaker.
He used that as a software. All of the belongings you’re speaking about, the regulatory constructions he put in, these had been instruments to persuade those that these property that they’d beforehand believed in and didn’t anymore consider in nonetheless had some sort of basic worth that might be helpful to society.
Barry Ritholtz: One of many issues FDR did was take us off the gold commonplace and gold had lengthy been regarded as if not cash, effectively actually cash. Like how did the elimination of the USA Treasury Division in Central Financial institution from a gold commonplace impression our idea of cash?
Paul Vigna: Gold had been used and for, you already know, everybody is aware of gold has been used all through historical past as cash, however gold isn’t truly cash, gold is a illustration of cash. Something could be a illustration of cash, gold greenback payments, cash, calorie shells, digits, crypto, Bitcoin, you already know, I imply you possibly can have a, a digital ledger that represents cash. All of these issues can be utilized as cash. None of them are cash. Cash is the system.
Within the (Nineteen Thirties) thirties you might have the gold commonplace, the economic system begins collapsing, folks begin hoarding gold. There’s not sufficient circulating foreign money for the federal government and for FDR to do something that he desires to do. So he has to persuade folks to think about the system. And what he does is, you possibly can see this, he maneuvers folks over to believing within the system and he maneuvers them away from the religion in gold.
That isn’t what issues. What issues is the soundness of the banks. What issues is the soundness of the federal government consider in these issues, trust, think about all these issues. And when he did that, as soon as he did that, he obtained folks sort of believing once more, then he went and removed the gold commonplace.
Barry Ritholtz: Is cash a retailer of worth or is it a medium of trade?
Paul Vigna: Cash is each of these issues. Cash is a retailer of worth. It’s a medium of trade. It’s a unit of account. Something can actually be a retailer of worth. Most of what you already know, the markets commerce in are shops of worth. Something can actually be a unit of account. It simply so occurs that it’s {dollars}. However any foreign money will work simply as effectively so long as the people who find themselves utilizing all of it agree upon it. And all of them can work as a way of trade. Something can work as a way of trade, barter can work as a way of trade. These are simply features. These are usually not the factor itself. The factor itself is nothing greater than a shared collective perception on this system.
Barry Ritholtz: guess cash is a collective delusion. It’s an summary factor that might not exist with out human beings, not like bushes or copper or gold for that matter. However it’s a part of a collective system of perception. It depends on confidence, it depends on religion. If the system is doubted, it begins to creak and it begins to crack. And we find yourself with circumstances just like the Weymar Republic or Zimbabwe, which is why it’s so essential for a society to keep up a perception that their techniques, and this contains banks, debt and credit score, our sound and we’ll proceed to work.
I’m Barry Ritholtz. That is Bloomberg’s on the Cash.
~~~
Discover our total music playlist for On the Cash on Spotify.
