Shortly after Hunter Lightman joined OpenAI as a researcher in 2022, he watched his colleagues launch ChatGPT, one of many fastest-growing merchandise ever. In the meantime, Lightman quietly labored on a staff educating OpenAI’s fashions to resolve highschool math competitions.
At this time that staff, referred to as MathGen, is taken into account instrumental to OpenAI’s industry-leading effort to create AI reasoning fashions: the core know-how behind AI brokers that may do duties on a pc like a human would.
“We had been attempting to make the fashions higher at mathematical reasoning, which on the time they weren’t excellent at,” Lightman instructed TechCrunch, describing MathGen’s early work.
OpenAI’s fashions are removed from good at present — the corporate’s newest AI methods nonetheless hallucinate and its brokers battle with complicated duties.
However its state-of-the-art fashions have improved considerably on mathematical reasoning. One in every of OpenAI’s fashions lately gained a gold medal on the Worldwide Math Olympiad, a math competitors for the world’s brightest highschool college students. OpenAI believes these reasoning capabilities will translate to different topics, and in the end energy general-purpose brokers that the corporate has at all times dreamed of constructing.
ChatGPT was a contented accident — a lowkey analysis preview turned viral shopper enterprise — however OpenAI’s brokers are the product of a years-long, deliberate effort inside the firm.
“Finally, you’ll simply ask the pc for what you want and it’ll do all of those duties for you,” stated OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on the firm’s first developer convention in 2023. “These capabilities are sometimes talked about within the AI discipline as brokers. The upsides of this are going to be great.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Whether or not brokers will meet Altman’s imaginative and prescient stays to be seen, however OpenAI shocked the world with the discharge of its first AI reasoning mannequin, o1, within the fall of 2024. Lower than a 12 months later, the 21 foundational researchers behind that breakthrough are probably the most extremely sought-after expertise in Silicon Valley.
Mark Zuckerberg recruited 5 of the o1 researchers to work on Meta’s new superintelligence-focused unit, providing some compensation packages north of $100 million. One in every of them, Shengjia Zhao, was lately named chief scientist of Meta Superintelligence Labs.
The reinforcement studying renaissance
The rise of OpenAI’s reasoning fashions and brokers are tied to a machine studying coaching method referred to as reinforcement studying (RL). RL offers suggestions to an AI mannequin on whether or not its decisions had been appropriate or not in simulated environments.
RL has been used for many years. For example, in 2016, a couple of 12 months after OpenAI was based in 2015, an AI system created by Google DeepMind utilizing RL, AlphaGo, gained international consideration after beating a world champion within the board sport, Go.
Round that point, one in all OpenAI’s first workers, Andrej Karpathy, started pondering find out how to leverage RL to create an AI agent that might use a pc. However it might take years for OpenAI to develop the mandatory fashions and coaching strategies.
By 2018, OpenAI pioneered its first massive language mannequin within the GPT sequence, pretrained on huge quantities of web knowledge and a big clusters of GPUs. GPT fashions excelled at textual content processing, ultimately resulting in ChatGPT, however struggled with fundamental math.
It took till 2023 for OpenAI to attain a breakthrough, initially dubbed “Q*” after which “Strawberry,” by combining LLMs, RL, and a method known as test-time computation. The latter gave the fashions further time and computing energy to plan and work via issues, verifying its steps, earlier than offering a solution.
This allowed OpenAI to introduce a brand new method known as “chain-of-thought” (CoT), which improved AI’s efficiency on math questions the fashions hadn’t seen earlier than.
“I might see the mannequin beginning to motive,” stated El Kishky. “It could discover errors and backtrack, it might get pissed off. It actually felt like studying the ideas of an individual.”
Although individually these strategies weren’t novel, OpenAI uniquely mixed them to create Strawberry, which immediately led to the event of o1. OpenAI rapidly recognized that the planning and reality checking talents of AI reasoning fashions may very well be helpful to energy AI brokers.
“We had solved an issue that I had been banging my head towards for a few years,” stated Lightman. “It was one of the vital thrilling moments of my analysis profession.”
Scaling reasoning
With AI reasoning fashions, OpenAI decided it had two new axes that will permit it to enhance AI fashions: utilizing extra computational energy in the course of the post-training of AI fashions, and giving AI fashions extra time and processing energy whereas answering a query.
“OpenAI, as an organization, thinks loads about not simply the best way issues are, however the best way issues are going to scale,” stated Lightman.
Shortly after the 2023 Strawberry breakthrough, OpenAI spun up an “Brokers” staff led by OpenAI researcher Daniel Selsam to make additional progress on this new paradigm, two sources instructed TechCrunch. Though the staff was known as “Brokers,” OpenAI didn’t initially differentiate between reasoning fashions and brokers as we consider them at present. The corporate simply needed to make AI methods able to finishing complicated duties.
Finally, the work of Selsam’s Brokers staff grew to become half of a bigger mission to develop the o1 reasoning mannequin, with leaders together with OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, chief analysis officer Mark Chen, and chief scientist Jakub Pachocki.
OpenAI must divert valuable sources — primarily expertise and GPUs — to create o1. All through OpenAI’s historical past, researchers have needed to negotiate with firm leaders to acquire sources; demonstrating breakthroughs was a surefire technique to safe them.
“One of many core elements of OpenAI is that every thing in analysis is backside up,” stated Lightman. “After we confirmed the proof [for o1], the corporate was like, ‘This is sensible, let’s push on it.’”
Some former workers say that the startup’s mission to develop AGI was the important thing think about attaining breakthroughs round AI reasoning fashions. By specializing in growing the smartest-possible AI fashions, quite than merchandise, OpenAI was capable of prioritize o1 above different efforts. That kind of enormous funding in concepts wasn’t at all times doable at competing AI labs.
The choice to strive new coaching strategies proved prescient. By late 2024, a number of main AI labs began seeing diminishing returns on fashions created via conventional pretraining scaling. At this time, a lot of the AI discipline’s momentum comes from advances in reasoning fashions.
What does it imply for an AI to “motive?”
In some ways, the purpose of AI analysis is to recreate human intelligence with computer systems. Because the launch of o1, ChatGPT’s UX has been crammed with extra human-sounding options similar to “considering” and “reasoning.”
When requested whether or not OpenAI’s fashions had been really reasoning, El Kishky hedged, saying he thinks concerning the idea when it comes to pc science.
“We’re educating the mannequin find out how to effectively expend compute to get a solution. So when you outline it that means, sure, it’s reasoning,” stated El Kishky.
Lightman takes the method of specializing in the mannequin’s outcomes and never as a lot on the means or their relation to human brains.
“If the mannequin is doing onerous issues, then it’s doing no matter crucial approximation of reasoning it wants as a way to try this,” stated Lightman. “We are able to name it reasoning, as a result of it seems like these reasoning traces, but it surely’s all only a proxy for attempting to make AI instruments which can be actually highly effective and helpful to lots of people.”
OpenAI’s researchers word folks could disagree with their nomenclature or definitions of reasoning — and certainly, critics have emerged — however they argue it’s much less vital than the capabilities of their fashions. Different AI researchers are inclined to agree.
Nathan Lambert, an AI researcher with the non-profit AI2, compares AI reasoning modes to airplanes in a weblog put up. Each, he says, are artifical methods impressed by nature — human reasoning and chook flight, respectively — however they function via totally completely different mechanisms. That doesn’t make them any much less helpful, or any much less able to attaining comparable outcomes.
A bunch of AI researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind agreed in a current place paper that AI reasoning fashions should not properly understood at present, and extra analysis is required. It could be too early to confidently declare what precisely is occurring inside them.
The following frontier: AI brokers for subjective duties
The AI brokers in the marketplace at present work greatest for well-defined, verifiable domains similar to coding. OpenAI’s Codex agent goals to assist software program engineers offload easy coding duties. In the meantime, Anthropic’s fashions have change into significantly widespread in AI coding instruments like Cursor and Claude Code — these are among the first AI brokers that persons are keen to pay up for.
Nonetheless, normal goal AI brokers like OpenAI’s ChatGPT Agent and Perplexity’s Comet battle with most of the complicated, subjective duties folks wish to automate. When attempting to make use of these instruments for on-line procuring or discovering a long-term parking spot, I’ve discovered the brokers take longer than I’d like and make foolish errors.
Brokers are, after all, early methods that can undoubtedly enhance. However researchers should first determine find out how to higher practice the underlying fashions to finish duties which can be extra subjective.
“Like many issues in machine studying, it’s a knowledge drawback,” stated Lightman, when requested concerning the limitations of brokers on subjective duties. “Among the analysis I’m actually enthusiastic about proper now is determining find out how to practice on much less verifiable duties. We now have some leads on find out how to do these items.”
Noam Brown, an OpenAI researcher who helped create the IMO mannequin and o1, instructed TechCrunch that OpenAI has new general-purpose RL strategies which permit them to show AI fashions abilities that aren’t simply verified. This was how the corporate constructed the mannequin which achieved a gold medal at IMO, he stated.
OpenAI’s IMO mannequin was a more moderen AI system that spawns a number of brokers, which then concurrently discover a number of concepts, after which select the very best reply. Most of these AI fashions are rising in popularity; Google and xAI have lately launched state-of-the-art fashions utilizing this method.
“I feel these fashions will change into extra succesful at math, and I feel they’ll get extra succesful in different reasoning areas as properly,” stated Brown. “The progress has been extremely quick. I don’t see any motive to suppose it should decelerate.”
These strategies could assist OpenAI’s fashions change into extra performant, beneficial properties that might present up within the firm’s upcoming GPT-5 mannequin. OpenAI hopes to claim its dominance over rivals with the launch of GPT-5, ideally providing the greatest AI mannequin to energy brokers for builders and customers.
However the firm additionally desires to make its merchandise less complicated to make use of. El Kishky says OpenAI desires to develop AI brokers that intuitively perceive what customers need, with out requiring them to pick out particular settings. He says OpenAI goals to construct AI methods that perceive when to name up sure instruments, and the way lengthy to motive for.
These concepts paint an image of an final model of ChatGPT: an agent that may do something on the web for you, and perceive the way you need it to be accomplished. That’s a a lot completely different product than what ChatGPT is at present, however the firm’s analysis is squarely headed on this route.
Whereas OpenAI undoubtedly led the AI {industry} just a few years in the past, the corporate now faces a tranche of worthy opponents. The query is not simply whether or not OpenAI can ship its agentic future, however can the corporate achieve this earlier than Google, Anthropic, xAI, or Meta beat them to it?
