Jamie Golombek: Whereas salaried staff can carry some bills over yr to yr, commissioned staff face limits
Opinions and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia could earn an affiliate fee from purchases made via hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
In case you incur varied bills for which you aren’t reimbursed by your employer, together with bills for a house workplace, you could possibly declare a deduction in your return for them. However what in case your bills are so massive that they exceed your employment earnings? Are they nonetheless deductible towards different earnings? Or can they be carried ahead, and utilized in a future yr?
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
Article content material
That was the problem in a latest tax case determined earlier this month involving a Montreal funding adviser. However earlier than delving into the main points of this case, let’s overview the essential guidelines concerning the deductibility of employment bills.
To be entitled to deduct unreimbursed employment bills, an worker must receive a replica of a correctly accomplished and signed Canada Income Company Kind T2200, Declaration of Situations of Employment from their employer. A brand new and simplified model of this CRA type for the 2024 tax yr was simply launched this week (extra about that in a future column).
Typical deductible employment bills (if unreimbursed) for salaried staff can embrace: allowable motorized vehicle bills, out-of-town journey bills, parking (apart from at your employer’s place of job), workplace provides, wage for an assistant (if required by your employer), workplace lease, and residential workplace bills.
For salaried staff, if the allowable employment bills are higher than the related employment earnings, the online result’s an employment loss, which might be utilized towards another supply of earnings for the yr. And, if not used within the present yr, it may be carried over to a different yr as a non-capital loss.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Staff who obtain a part of their compensation within the type of commissions, nonetheless, can deduct a broader vary of “gross sales bills.” These can embrace accounting charges, promoting and promotion bills, and the price of meals and leisure when taking out purchasers. However the catch is that gross sales bills claimed by a commissioned worker are restricted to the worker’s fee earnings that yr.
If an worker’s complete fee bills are greater than the commissions obtained, the worker can select to assert bills as an peculiar salaried worker as an alternative, during which case the worker’s expense declare isn’t restricted to the commissions obtained within the yr. Underneath this methodology, nonetheless, the worker can solely declare the extra restrictive record of employment bills permitted for salaried staff.
The latest tax case concerned a commissioned funding advisor who began a brand new job in September 2012. Throughout the previous couple of months of 2012, he incurred about $59,500 in employment bills. Throughout this era, he earned lower than $2,000 in wage, and no fee earnings.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Since commissioned gross sales representatives are restricted to deducting bills towards the fee earnings earned, and the advisor had no fee earnings in 2012, he claimed no tax deduction for that yr. In 2013, nonetheless, he earned substantial fee earnings that far exceeded the $59,500 in bills that he had incurred in 2012, and so he claimed a deduction of the $59,500 incurred in 2012 from that 2013 earnings.
The CRA reassessed the taxpayer’s 2012 and 2013 years. For 2012, the CRA did permit about $22,100 of the bills claimed underneath the final employment expense guidelines for salaried staff, as mentioned above. However for 2013, the CRA disallowed the remaining $37,400 ($59,500 much less $22,100) in bills on the idea that they have been incurred in 2012, and easily couldn’t be claimed in 2013.
The taxpayer tried to argue that a lot of his bills have been “pre-paid bills,” comparable to hockey tickets, that have been first incurred in 2012, however “used up in 2013.” The issue was that the taxpayer couldn’t particularly determine what these bills have been. Because the choose wrote, “It’s not actually acceptable for a celebration to insist that they bought one thing in 2012 and consumed it in 2013, whereas not offering proof as to what precisely was bought in a single yr however not consumed till the next yr.”
Commercial 5
Article content material
The taxpayer then introduced one other argument, suggesting that the French model of the Revenue Tax Act provision governing commissioned worker bills was extra permissive, however the choose disagreed, discovering that each the “English and French texts of the related provisions of the Act have the identical that means.”
The choose went on to clarify that the place the legislation needs to permit bills to be claimed in years apart from the years during which they have been incurred, it explicitly gives for this within the Tax Act. For instance, in relation to the principles for deducting dwelling workplace bills, the Act says that these bills can solely be deducted as much as the quantity of employment earnings in that yr. However it then permits any extra dwelling workplace bills to be carried over to the next taxation yr to be deducted towards future employment earnings in that yr.
There may be, nonetheless, no such equal wording within the Tax Act for bills of commissioned staff, which might solely be deducted within the yr incurred.
Lastly, the choose defined that staff sometimes embrace quantities in earnings when “obtained or loved,” and that bills can solely be deducted when they’re paid. Primarily, which means taxpayers are required to report employment earnings on a “money foundation.” Citing Professor Vern Krishna’s traditional tax tome Fundamentals of Canadian Revenue Tax, the choose famous that whereas money accounting could current “a much less correct image of revenue than accrual accounting … Parliament has chosen to tightly management entry to tax deductions for workers to be able to shield the federal government’s income base and within the pursuits of administrative comfort.”
Commercial 6
Article content material
Really useful from Editorial
Because the choose summarized, the precise phrases within the Tax Act governing bills of commissioned staff state that an worker could deduct “quantities expended not exceeding the commissions … obtained by the taxpayer within the yr.” This clearly limits deductions to bills truly paid within the specific yr, and are capped on the fee earnings obtained in that very same yr. The laws doesn’t give taxpayers the selection to compute earnings on a non-cash foundation. Because the choose concluded, “To search out in any other case would frustrate the restrict in (the Act) that the deduction not exceed the fee earnings ‘obtained’ within the yr. The textual content, context and goal of the availability all help that conclusion.”
The choose due to this fact dismissed the taxpayer’s attraction, and the surplus employment bills have been discovered to be non-deductible.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].
In case you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you should know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
