24.1 C
New York
Tuesday, August 12, 2025

The Psychology of Investing #12: What You Don’t See Can Damage You


Admission Open for My Worth Investing Workshops (Offline): I’m excited to announce admissions to my upcoming in-person worth investing workshops within the following cities:

  • Bengaluru – Sunday, thirteenth July 2025
  • Hyderabad – Sunday, twenty seventh July 2025
  • Mumbai – Sunday, tenth August 2025

Click on right here to know extra and ebook your seat.

Seats are restricted in every metropolis. The primary 20 members can declare an early fowl low cost.


The Web is brimming with assets that proclaim, “almost every little thing you believed about investing is inaccurate.” Nevertheless, there are far fewer that purpose that can assist you turn into a greater investor by revealing that “a lot of what you assume you realize about your self is inaccurate.” On this sequence of posts on the psychology of investing, I’ll take you thru the journey of the most important psychological flaws we endure from that causes us to make dumb errors in investing. This sequence is a part of a joint investor training initiative between Safal Niveshak and DSP Mutual Fund.


Think about an eccentric (and bored) tycoon providing you $10 million to play Russian roulette… 5 of the six histories would result in enrichment; one would result in a statistic… The issue is that solely one of many histories is noticed in actuality.

— Nassim Taleb, Fooled by Randomness

We’re a story-driven species. From cave partitions to stability sheets, we search for narratives that specify the world and our place in it. And nowhere is that this tendency extra harmful than once we solely study from the winners. Once we permit survival alone to indicate superiority. When the truth that somebody or one thing made it by turns into sufficient proof that they knew what they had been doing.

That is the essence of survivorship bias, and on the planet of investing, it distorts virtually every little thing.

Contemplate the inventory market, which is filled with seen winners. We regularly hear tales of shares that went 20x, fund managers who outperformed for a decade, corporations that pivoted into success, and traders who grew to become celebrities.

These survivors are in every single place. They dominate the headlines and form our psychological fashions of what success appears to be like like.

However what concerning the others? Those who didn’t make it? The businesses that failed whereas nobody observed? The traders who blew up and left the sport? They’re barely talked about, not often studied, and virtually by no means remembered. And so, the narrative we inherit is hopelessly incomplete.

That’s how the phantasm begins. We expect we’re studying how the sport is performed, however we’re solely studying from these nonetheless on the desk. It’s like observing solely the planes that returned from battle, and deciding the place to strengthen the armour, with out fascinated with those that by no means got here again (learn extra on this story).

Now, the issue isn’t simply that we miss some knowledge. It’s that the very nature of the info we do see is skewed. The lesson is baked right into a biased pattern, and but we deal with it as common.

Take inventory indices, for instance. The Sensex and Nifty have risen fantastically over a long time. Charts present a neat upward slope that appears to verify the timeless knowledge: keep invested, and also you’ll win. However hidden beneath that slope is a steady but quiet rotation. The businesses that underperform are eliminated. The failures are dropped. Solely the stronger corporations stay.

So, what appears to be like just like the resilience of the market is partly a survivor impact. The index is consistently pruned to take away the weak. Most traders by no means see this. They assume the index is a static entity, forgetting that the rationale it appears to be like so robust is as a result of it has been rigorously rebalanced to make sure it does.

It’s not a lie, however it’s not the entire fact both. It’s a curated model of actuality, which is designed for survivorship.

Now apply that very same lens to mutual funds. Yearly, we see adverts highlighting high performers over 5- or 10-year intervals. Traders chase these funds, believing they’ve discovered constant outperformance. However most individuals by no means ask what number of funds even survived these 10 years. Many didn’t.

The underperformers had been shut down, merged away, or quietly buried below new scheme names. Their poor returns don’t make it into the “high fund” adverts. Which suggests the typical efficiency of surviving funds is commonly inflated, as a result of the worst outcomes had been deleted from the info set.

So, once we look again at long-term fund returns with out adjusting for people who disappeared, we’re not seeing how fund managers really carried out throughout the board. We’re seeing how the winners carried out and mistaking it for the typical.

After which there’s probably the most seductive area of all: success tales. Enterprise books, biographies, and podcast interviews are all proudly constructed on the identical query: “How did you do it?”

However that query, when requested solely of survivors, creates a harmful narrative. It turns randomness into knowledge and luck into technique.

A founder who succeeded in opposition to all odds is praised for her imaginative and prescient, her grit, and her instinct. However what concerning the 100 others who had the identical qualities and failed? What concerning the timing, the macro situations, the investor curiosity, the random tailwinds that nobody might have deliberate?

None of that will get included within the closing story. And so we begin to assume: that is how success works. That is the roadmap. Simply do what she did.

In investing, we see this with concentrated portfolios. Somebody places 40% of their wealth in a single inventory, and it really works. Immediately, it’s a genius transfer. Folks quote Charlie Munger’s love for “few bets, large bets, rare bets.” What they don’t quote are the numerous traders who did the identical factor and misplaced every little thing. As a result of they’re gone. As a result of their voices aren’t round.

Survivorship bias additionally impacts how we view threat. When dangerous behaviour pays off, it’s reframed as boldness or foresight. However when it doesn’t, there’s no reframing…simply silence.

The lesson that reaches the general public, although, is evident: take daring bets. It labored for him, it might give you the results you want. However that’s the equal of watching 5 Russian roulette winners and deciding the sport should be secure.

As Taleb says, it’s not simply defective logic however a deadly logic. The hazard isn’t all the time seen. And that’s what makes it so interesting.

Even the gurus we study from, like Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch are sometimes outliers. They’d the ability, sure. But in addition timing, temperament, and a novel mixture of circumstances. After they clarify their ideas, it’s tempting to assume these ideas are universally repeatable. However what we don’t see are the 1000’s who tried related approaches and didn’t beat the market.

The bottom charge will get ignored. The framework will get deified. And we overlook that generally, even the appropriate selections result in the flawed outcomes. As a result of markets aren’t truthful judges of effort. They’re chaotic and sluggish to reward perception.

Survivorship bias additionally has a merciless psychological impact. It makes failure really feel private. When everybody you comply with appears to be doing nicely, when the articles are full of individuals making crores, and when each podcast options somebody who noticed a multi-bagger early, it’s straightforward to really feel such as you’re behind. That you simply missed the boat and also you’re not as good.

However the fact is, you’re not seeing “everybody.” You’re seeing solely those that are nonetheless within the sport. Those who stayed quiet after their dangerous selections or investments aren’t within the room. Those who made the identical bets because the winners, however on the flawed time or with the flawed inventory, aren’t being interviewed. And so we examine ourselves to not the market, however to probably the most seen and profitable examples inside it.

It’s not a good comparability. However our minds don’t know that.

So, the query now could be: how will we shield ourselves from this distortion?

First, study to ask higher questions. Not “What labored?” however “What else was tried that didn’t?” Not “How did this individual succeed?” however “What number of tried this path and failed?”

Second, remind your self that almost all of what you see is filtered. Most tales are success tales as a result of these are those that get advised. Failure is commonly simply as instructive, generally extra so, however it not often will get a voice.

Third, floor your self in base charges. If solely 5% of microcaps turn into smallcaps or midcaps, then each story of that taking place must be understood in that context. You possibly can nonetheless wager on microcaps, however wager with consciousness, not phantasm.

And at last, a very powerful of all of it, keep humble. Success is fragile. And even the survivors, in the event that they’re sincere, will admit that they had been usually only one determination, or one disaster, away from not making it.

All in all, survivorship bias doesn’t simply skew how we take into consideration investing. It skews how we take into consideration effort, threat, course of, and even identification. It makes us assume we all know greater than we do, just because we’ve solely seen the tales that ended nicely. However the true classes usually lie in what we’ll by no means see, of the companies that just about made it or the individuals who did every little thing proper and nonetheless misplaced.

These tales are gone. However the silence they left behind ought to educate us one thing too.


Two Books. One Goal. A Higher Life.

“Uncover the extraordinary inside.”

—Manish Chokhani, Director, Enam Holdings

“It is a masterpiece.”

—Morgan Housel, Writer, Psychology of Cash


Disclaimer: This text is printed as a part of a joint investor training initiative between Safal Niveshak and DSP Mutual Fund. All Mutual fund traders should undergo a one-time KYC (Know Your Buyer) course of. Traders ought to deal solely with Registered Mutual Funds (‘RMF’). For more information on KYC, RMF & process to lodge/ redress any complaints, go to dspim.com/IEID. Mutual Fund investments are topic to market dangers, learn all scheme associated paperwork

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles