30.4 C
New York
Sunday, August 10, 2025

The Psychology of Investing #13: The Deception of a Good Consequence


A number of fast updates from Safal Niveshak HQ:

Particular Anniversary Reductions:
🎁 The Sketchbook of Knowledge & Boundless: Now out there at discounted costs for a restricted time (until thirtieth July):

🎁 Mastermind Worth Investing membership: ₹3000 off for brand spanking new members. Click on right here to hitch now.

🎁 Worth Investing Almanack e-newsletter: ₹3000 off on the annual plan. Click on right here to hitch now.

Offline Worth Investing Workshops in Hyderabad and Mumbai:
Be part of me in-person for a day of deep studying, reflection, and conversations round worth investing and life. Click on right here for particulars and registration.

On-line Masterclass – The Artwork of Valuation:
A 3-hour stay session on decoding intrinsic worth and studying how nice buyers take into consideration value vs. price. Click on right here for particulars and registration.


The Web is brimming with assets that proclaim, “almost the whole lot you believed about investing is inaccurate.” Nevertheless, there are far fewer that goal that will help you develop into a greater investor by revealing that “a lot of what you suppose you understand about your self is inaccurate.” On this sequence of posts on the psychology of investing, I’ll take you thru the journey of the most important psychological flaws we undergo from that causes us to make dumb errors in investing. This sequence is a part of a joint investor schooling initiative between Safal Niveshak and DSP Mutual Fund.


I’ve a pal from faculty who works at an MNC in Gurgaon. That is from round 2018. Each Friday evening, his workplace colleagues would collect on the identical bar. Alcohol adopted, and by midnight, my intoxicated pal would swagger out of the bar and slip into the motive force’s seat of his automotive to drive again house. It grew to become routine.

As he informed us, he knew he’d had an excessive amount of, however he additionally knew one thing else: he at all times reached house safely. Not as soon as had he been pulled over. Not as soon as had he gotten into an accident. And so, when a number of of us faculty pals, out of fear, tried to speak to him concerning the apparent hazard of ingesting and driving, he would wave us off with a smile and say, “Guys, calm down. I’ve achieved this for years. I do know what I’m doing.”

To him, the result of reaching house with out incident justified the choice. Again and again. Till sooner or later, it didn’t.

He hit a divider late one evening and fortunately didn’t damage anybody, besides himself and his automotive. With a number of damaged bones, he was bedridden for a number of weeks. Nevertheless, it wasn’t the severity of the crash that haunted him, however the realisation of how lengthy he’d been trusting luck over logic. And simply because the result had stored turning out fantastic.

This, my pal, is Consequence Bias, which leads us tojudge the standard of a choice based mostly on its consequence, as a substitute of the thought or course of that went into it.

So, so long as the result is beneficial, we assume the choice was good. When it seems badly, we blame the choice, even when it made good sense on the time.

Take into account investing. We frequently imagine {that a} good funding is one which made cash. However creating wealth doesn’t at all times imply you made resolution. Simply as dropping cash doesn’t essentially imply the choice was poor.

There’s a deeper reality in investing that many people overlook, which is that you are able to do the whole lot proper and nonetheless lose cash. And you are able to do the whole lot mistaken and nonetheless make a revenue. I’ve been there and achieved that. And it is because the market, like life, doesn’t at all times reward effort, course of, or self-discipline on schedule. Generally, and infrequently within the quick run, it’s simply the roll of the cube.

Poker champion and creator in cognitive-behavioural resolution science, Annie Duke, calls this “ensuing.” In poker, gamers consistently make choices beneath uncertainty. You could possibly have the percentages stacked in your favour and nonetheless lose the hand. Or you can play recklessly and win. However should you begin assuming that successful equals good technique, and dropping equals dangerous judgement, you’ll study all of the mistaken classes. That’s ensuing, and it’s what final result bias appears to be like like in actual time.

She wrote in her e book Pondering in Bets:

You may take into consideration [resulting] as creating too tight a relationship between the standard of the result and the standard of the choice. You may’t use final result high quality as an ideal sign of resolution high quality, not with a small pattern measurement anyway. I imply, actually, if somebody has gotten in 15 automotive accidents within the final 12 months, I can actually work backward from the result high quality to their resolution high quality. However one accident doesn’t inform me a lot.

In chess, if I lose a recreation, it’s fairly sure that I made a nasty resolution someplace and I can go search for it. That’s a very cheap technique. However it’s a very unreasonable technique in poker. If I lose a hand, I could have performed the hand actually completely and nonetheless misplaced as a result of there’s this luck factor to it. The issue is that we’re all resulters at coronary heart.

Consequence bias leads us to deeply flawed considering. As an example, you would possibly begin believing that placing all of your cash into one high-risk inventory is a brilliant transfer as a result of it labored as soon as. Or that avoiding a specific sector was silly as a result of it later rallied.

However hindsight is a harmful lens. Simply because one thing labored doesn’t imply it was the fitting factor to do. However, simply because it didn’t work doesn’t imply it was mistaken.

The actual downside is that final result bias not solely distorts our view of the previous, however that it shapes our future choices. If a nasty resolution results in consequence, we frequently reinforce it. We do it once more. Worse, we up the stakes. It turns into a behavior. And like my pal, we belief the sample till it breaks. When that occurs in investing, it might result in monetary spoil.

Consequence bias additionally leads us to punish good behaviour unfairly. Think about somebody who caught to their asset allocation plan, averted chasing scorching shares, and rebalanced usually, however ended up underperforming in a 12 months when speculative bets did effectively. That particular person would possibly really feel silly, regardless that they adopted a sound course of.

The irony is that the extra disciplined your course of, the extra typically you’ll look mistaken within the quick time period.

For this reason many considerate buyers I do know of preserve a choice journal. They don’t simply monitor what they purchased or offered but additionally write down why they made every resolution. In addition they write what assumptions did they make, what dangers did they think about, and what was the vary of doable outcomes.

Later, they revisit these notes to see if the logic nonetheless holds, impartial of the consequence. This fashion, they study from the method, not simply the cash they made or misplaced on the funding.

You see, one of many hardest elements of investing is separating sign from noise. Consequence bias blurs that line. A one-time win seems like perception. A short lived loss seems like stupidity. However the reality is, short-term outcomes typically say little or no concerning the high quality of your considering. It’s as a result of markets are messy and unpredictable, and randomness performs a bigger function than we’d prefer to admit.

Anyway, now for a very powerful query: What can we do to guard ourselves from final result bias?

I believe step one, like at all times, is consciousness. Simply figuring out that this bias exists is highly effective. Begin by asking: Would I’ve made this identical resolution if the result had been totally different? Would I think about this particular person insightful if their wager hadn’t labored? Questions like these enable you to step again and see the method extra clearly.

The second step is constructing techniques. Whether or not it’s journaling or creating checklists, techniques assist anchor you to your individual reasoning. They create area between stimulus and response. When issues go effectively, you possibly can ask: did I observe my course of, or did I simply get fortunate? When issues go mistaken, you possibly can say: I did what I assumed was proper, and I’ll stay with that.

The third step is cultivating humility. It’s okay to confess when luck helped. It’s okay to confess while you have been mistaken for the fitting causes. The market doesn’t owe you rewards for good behaviour. However over time, sound choices compound, even when a few of them damage within the quick run.

Lastly, encompass your self with individuals who ask higher questions. Individuals who received’t simply say “Properly achieved” when one thing works, however will ask, “How did you suppose by that?” or “What made you are taking that decision?” These are the conversations that enable you to develop.

Annie Duke wrote in her e book:

You may enhance the likelihood that you’ll have good outcomes by bettering your decision-making, however that isn’t making your individual luck. That’s rising the probabilities that you’ve got final result. You may’t assure that issues will end up effectively and regardless that you may need made choices that elevated the likelihood that you’ve got final result, you can not assure it. You can not make luck go your approach.

It’s this concept of incrementally rising the probabilities that issues go effectively for you and that hopefully, these issues play out over time.

Ultimately, final result bias is simply one other approach we idiot ourselves. It flatters the ego when issues go effectively and bruises it after they don’t. However investing isn’t about being flattered. It’s about surviving uncertainty with readability. It’s about constructing a course of you possibly can belief, particularly when the outcomes are unclear.

Like my pal, we are able to all fall into the lure of trusting outcomes over reasoning. However in contrast to him, we don’t have to attend for a crash to get up.


Disclaimer: This text is printed as a part of a joint investor schooling initiative between Safal Niveshak and DSP Mutual Fund. All Mutual fund buyers must undergo a one-time KYC (Know Your Buyer) course of. Buyers ought to deal solely with Registered Mutual Funds (‘RMF’). For more information on KYC, RMF & process to lodge/ redress any complaints, go to dspim.com/IEID. Mutual Fund investments are topic to market dangers, learn all scheme associated paperwork fastidiously.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles